It maybe a bit strange to start of this blog with a post about Mule, but the release of version 3.0 of the Mule community edition is certainly a valid reason.
It's been a while since I wrote the book Open-source ESBs in Action with Jos Dirksen. But the coverage of Mule in that book was based on Mule 2.x, which was the current version until a few weeks. In the last couple of years other open source integration frameworks like Apache Camel and Spring Integration came along and provided similar functionality. With version 3.0 Mule steps up again and provides great additional functionality with foremost the following features: hot deployment, new flow based architecture, annotation support and better support for web services and rest.
I want to highlight two features of Mule 3.0 in this post, which are the new flow based architecture and hot deployment. Previous versions of Mule had a service based architecture to implement your integration logic. The following picture taken from the Mule userguide describes it in a very easy manner.
Nothing wrong with this kind of architecture, but it becomes a bit tricky when you have to specify all kinds of transfers, multiple component classes etc. The new flow based architecture solves these issues and provides a very clean and flexible architecture based on message processors and sources to implement your integration logic (see the following figure taken from the userguide).
This looks very simple doesn't it? For a very small example like I've implemented here, the differences are not huge of course. But you can imagine that for more complex examples, the new flow based architecture makes your life a lot easier.
The other huge improvement in Mule 3.0 is hot deployment. One of the main differences between Apache ServiceMix and Mule when we wrote the Open-source ESBs in Action book was a hot deployment feature from an enterprise perspective. And now with version 3.0 it's there and looks very promissing. In the apps directory of the Mule installation you can now deploy a Mule configuration and JARs (if necessary) and Mule picks it up automatically. Then, if you want to change the Mule configuration you can simply update the file and again Mule picks it up automatically. For more information you can look at the userguide. Hot deployment now works for a lot of implementations, but there is still some room for improvement. For example, only the main Mule configuration file is monitored by Mule, not its child Mule configurations. When compared to other open source ESBs like Apache ServiceMix and Open ESB, I see that Mule takes a web application like approach to hot deployment, where the others use OSGi.
So to summarize, version 3.0 is certainly a step forward! It provides a lot of improvements and some great new features including the discussed hot deployment and the new flow based architecture. And from a perspective of the open source BPM Activiti project I'm enthousiastic about the possibilities of integration between Mule and Activiti. So I hope to see Activiti integration in the next 3.x version of Mule.